Having been roundly savaged in these columns for suggesting that a language may be implemented by interpreting its semantics, and that denotational semantics is inherantly operational and hence executable, I thought it important to re-establish my credibility with a convincing display of orthodoxy... No one has yet confessed to using Haskell for such degenerate purposes... The reference is: Hayes & Jones, `Specifications are not (necessarily) executable', Software Engineering Journal, Vol 4, No 6, pp330-338, 1989 Greg Michaelson
- Formal design spec into Haskell or Miranda HYDE M.D
- Re: Formal design spec into Haskell or Miranda Greg Michaelson
- Re: Formal design spec into Haskell or Miranda P Mukherjee
- Re: Formal design spec into Haskell or Miranda P Mukherjee
- Re: Formal design spec into Haskell or Miranda Andrew Butterfield
- Re: Formal design spec into Haskell or Miranda Andrew Moran
- Re: Formal design spec into Haskell or Miranda Greg Michaelson
- Re: Formal design spec into Haskell or Miranda Pieter Hartel
- Re: Formal design spec into Haskell or Miranda Jon Mountjoy