Re: Call for parsers

[Byron Hale]

Which Haskell tools, if any, correspond to MLYACC and MLLEX?

The document "The Definition of Standard ML (Revised)" attempts
to describe ML with a quality suitable for compiler writers.
Shouldn't Haskell have something of similiar quality and intent?

I realize that funding is an issue,
but these seem to be good examples.


Byron Hale
Effective Information
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(408)358-8064