> On Mon, 15 Jun 1998, Fergus Henderson wrote: > > > P.S. Is there any reason why something like `HyperEval' > > isn't built in to Haskell, or at least include in the > > Haskell Library report? Is there any implementation-specific > > precedent for something like this in say ghc? Dave Tweed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added: > I'd like to second this. It would have been very useful in some of the > stuff I've written, particularly since (understandably enough) when using > newtype you can't put ! annotations within the data-type. I believe this is what the derive program (available from Glasgow's web site) was originally developed for. -- Alastair Reid Yale Haskell Project Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://WWW.CS.Yale.EDU/homes/reid-alastair/
- Re: FW: Exceptions are too return values! Alastair Reid
- Re: FW: Exceptions are too return values! Carl R. Witty
- Re: Exceptions are too return values! Scott Turner
- Re: FW: Exceptions are too return values! Hans Aberg
- Re: Exceptions are too return values! Hans Aberg
- Re: Exceptions are too return values! Hans Aberg
- Re: Exceptions are too return values! Fergus Henderson
- Re: Exceptions are too return values! Fergus Henderson
- Re: FW: Exceptions are too return values! Fergus Henderson
- Re: Exceptions are too return values! Dave Tweed
- Re: Exceptions are too return values! Alastair Reid
- Re: Exceptions are too return values! Fergus Henderson
- Re: Exceptions are too return values! Fergus Henderson
- Re: FW: Exceptions are too return values! Simon L Peyton Jones
- RE: FW: Exceptions are too return values! Erik Zuurbier
- RE: FW: Exceptions are too return values! Hans Aberg
- RE: FW: Exceptions are too return values! Dave Tweed
- Re: FW: Exceptions are too return values! Hans Aberg
- Re: FW: Exceptions are too return values! Fergus Henderson
- Re: FW: Exceptions are too return values! Simon L Peyton Jones