Simon L Peyton Jones wrote: > So far as GHC is concerned, I wrote on this list a month ago: > "More specifically, I plan to continue beavering away on GHC. > GHC is public domain software, and Microsoft are happy for it to > remain so, source code and all. If anything, I'll have quite a bit > more time to work on it than before." Do you mean "public domain" literally, i.e. are you renouncing all copyright? (The source code contains copyright notices, but no licence, as far as I can see.) Ross Paterson
- Re: GHC licence (was Could Haskell be taken over ... Ross Paterson
- Re: GHC licence (was Could Haskell be taken ... Simon L Peyton Jones
- Re: GHC licence (was Could Haskell be taken ... Marko Schuetz
- Re: GHC licence (was Could Haskell be taken ... Jorgen Frojk Kjaersgaard
- Re: GHC licence (was Could Haskell be taken ... H. Conrad Cunningham
- Re: GHC licence (was Could Haskell be taken ... Jan Skibinski
- Re: GHC licence (was Could Haskell be taken ... Bonard B. Timmons III
- Re: GHC licence (was Could Haskell be taken ... Charles Godin