Hi Tim, >The Haskell Server page claims that one advantage of COM is that it >"ships for free with windows". This suggests that the existence of a >genuinely free CORBA ORB has been overlooked. > >IMHO ignoring CORBA is cutting Haskell off from the open software >world (including about 7 million Linux users), and from those >who dislike/fear Microsoft or just want a non-proprietary standard. We have been blinded by the MS propaganda I guess, but now I agree with you completely that we are missing a big market by doing only COM so a CORBA binding is now high on my priority list. As Sigbjorn said in his reply, it is hard to decide which ORB to use, and I did not know about omniORB. Great new project for the new academic year! Erik
- Re: Haskell, CORBA and Java (Was: Re: Current sta... Timothy Robin BARBOUR
- Re: Haskell, CORBA and Java (Was: Re: Curren... Erik Meijer
- Re: Haskell, CORBA and Java (Was: Re: Curren... Sigbjorn Finne
- Re: Haskell, CORBA and Java (Was: Re: Curren... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell, CORBA and Java (Was: Re: Curren... David Glen JEFFERY
- Re: Haskell, CORBA and Java (Was: Re: Curren... Sigbjorn Finne
- Re: Haskell, CORBA and Java (Was: Re: Curren... Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Haskell, CORBA and Java (Was: Re: Curren... Sigbjorn Finne
- Re: Haskell, CORBA and Java (Was: Re: Curren... Daan Leijen
- Re: Haskell, CORBA and Java (Was: Re: Curren... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell, CORBA and Java (Was: Re: Curren... Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell, CORBA and Java (Was: Re: Curren... Sigbjorn Finne