Johannes Waldmann wrote:
> even more, i'd like to see Ada naming convetions applied:
>
> you can "with" a package (import a module) (you get qualified
visibility)
> you can "use" a previously withe-ed package (unqualified
visibility) and
> you can "rename" identifiers. (that would probably be the same
as "=" for
> Haskell since we already got referential transparency). "with"
clauses
> _must_ be in the header, but "use" clauses may also be written
for local
> blocks (an additional plus, IMHO)
I'd like to support this proposal. The 'with' and 'use' perfectly explain
the intention of the import, and in my humble opinion to non-native
English speakers even better than qualified vs non-qualified.
Kris
--
Kris Aerts - monitor MI & FVI - tel. ++32/16/32.70.74 fax. ++32/16/32.79.97
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web http://www.kc.kuleuven.ac.be/~kris
interests: Haskell, FP and its user interfaces
"Everyone is complaining about their memory,
no one about their brain." La Rochefoucauld (1650)
