| Your thought would destroy equational reasoning! For example you | would be able to define different equalties on the same data | structure. So Red==Black could be False in one place and True | in another place. Does that make any sense? Of course, it does. You neglect the fact that definitions have scope. You can already define two functions both called say `eq' such that `eq Red Black' yields False in one place and True in another place. Cheers, Ralf
- topdelcs / decls Johannes Waldmann
- RE: topdelcs / decls Jan Laitenberger
- Re: topdelcs / decls Ralf Hinze
- Re: topdelcs / decls Johannes Waldmann
- RE: topdelcs / decls Ch. A. Herrmann
- RE: topdelcs / decls Hans Aberg
- Re: topdelcs / decls Ralf Hinze
- Re: topdelcs / decls Michael Hobbs
- Re: topdelcs / decls Koen Claessen
- Re: topdelcs / decls Felix Schroeter
- Re: topdelcs / decls Johannes Waldmann
- Re: topdelcs / decls Michael Hobbs