On 03-Nov-1998, Mark P Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ghc doesn't need to use an iteration limit because it subjects the input > source program to stricter limits to guarantee decidability. The release notes for ghc 4.00 mention a new `-fallow-undecidable-instances' option. I presume that it does what it says. -- Fergus Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "I have always known that the pursuit WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit" PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
- Re: Polymorphic recursion Kent Karlsson
- Re: Polymorphic recursion henglein
- Re: Polymorphic recursion Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Polymorphic recursion Simon L Peyton Jones
- Re: Polymorphic recursion Sebastian Hunt
- Polymorphic recursion Tomasz Łukaszewicz
- Re: Polymorphic recursion Fergus Henderson
- Re: Polymorphic recursion Michael Hanus
- Re: Polymorphic recursion Fergus Henderson
- RE: Polymorphic recursion Mark P Jones
- Re[2]: Polymorphic recursion Fergus Henderson
- Re[2]: Polymorphic recursion Shin-Cheng Mu
- RE: Polymorphic recursion Simon Peyton-Jones