Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  writes

> - The simple-context restriction.  
> ...
> My default position is not to change.  Question: who, apart from
> Ralf, has actually tripped over the lack of contexts of the
> form (C (a t1 .. tn)) in Haskell 1.4?  Is their lack a real
> problem in practice?


To me, the necessity of such contexts became evident; two such cases 
met where i cannot think of any other way out.
But i worry only for Haskell-2.

Also at this point, have we to forget of Haskell-1.4 and consider the
future Haskell-2 as extension of Haskell-98 ?


------------------
Sergey Mechveliani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to