Johannes Waldmann wrote: >i'd like to support Ralf's opinion: n+k patterns have advantages >(when used in a certain manner) so it would be good to keep them. > >personal reason: right now i'm busy giving tutorials on recursive functions >and it's really nice if you can write f(...,y+1) = ... (... y) >instead of f(...,y) = ... (... y-1) Why do you find this makes a significant difference? Personally, I find f x = ... f (x - 1) much more intuitive than f (x + 1) = ... f x I see no advantage in the n+k version. Craig
- Why I hate n+k Simon Peyton-Jones
- FW: Why I hate n+k Simon Marlow
- Re: Why I hate n+k Hans Aberg
- Re: FW: Why I hate n+k Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Why I hate n+k Pablo E. Martinez Lopez
- Re: Why I hate n+k Hans Aberg
- Re: Why I hate n+k Ralf Hinze
- Re: why I hate n+k Johannes Waldmann
- Re: Why I hate n+k Andrew Butterfield
- Re: FW: Why I hate n+k Graeme E Moss
- Re: why I hate n+k Craig Dickson
- Re: why I hate n+k Brian Boutel
- Re: why I hate n+k Craig Dickson
- RE: why I hate n+k Frank A. Christoph
- Re: why I hate n+k Johannes Waldmann