Johannes Waldmann wrote:
>i'd like to support Ralf's opinion: n+k patterns have advantages
>(when used in a certain manner) so it would be good to keep them.
>
>personal reason: right now i'm busy giving tutorials on recursive functions
>and it's really nice if you can write f(...,y+1) = ... (... y)
>instead of f(...,y) = ... (... y-1)
Why do you find this makes a significant difference? Personally, I find
f x = ... f (x - 1)
much more intuitive than
f (x + 1) = ... f x
I see no advantage in the n+k version.
Craig
- Why I hate n+k Simon Peyton-Jones
- FW: Why I hate n+k Simon Marlow
- Re: Why I hate n+k Hans Aberg
- Re: FW: Why I hate n+k Jon . Fairbairn
- Re: Why I hate n+k Pablo E. Martinez Lopez
- Re: Why I hate n+k Hans Aberg
- Re: Why I hate n+k Ralf Hinze
- Re: why I hate n+k Johannes Waldmann
- Re: Why I hate n+k Andrew Butterfield
- Re: FW: Why I hate n+k Graeme E Moss
- Re: why I hate n+k Craig Dickson
- Re: why I hate n+k Brian Boutel
- Re: why I hate n+k Craig Dickson
- RE: why I hate n+k Frank A. Christoph
- Re: why I hate n+k Johannes Waldmann
