The trend seems to be define wishes for haskell 2, so here are mine: We have already accepted undecidable type checking, so why not take a big step forward, and gain expressive power of a new magnitude, by extending the type system to allow dependent types. Cayenne, http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~augustss/cayenne, already has dependent types, but seems to be an experimental language only with a very small user base. Just a thought. /Lars L
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Lars Lundgren
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? S. Alexander Jacobson
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Carl R. Witty
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Lars Lundgren
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Lennart Augustsson
- RE: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? michael abbott
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Lars Lundgren
- RE: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? D. Tweed
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? George Beshers