On 18 Feb 1999, Carl R. Witty wrote: [Snip] > I fear my previous response to this message was a little hasty and > overly forceful. Let me try again. > > I think dependent types are great; I'd love to have the most powerful > type system possible. However, I'm also very wary of undecidable type > checking. [major snip] So, if i understand you correctly, you think that: dependent types are great, BUT *maybe* it is to hard to generate good error messages. and *maybe* typechecking will not work in practice. I think that maybe you are overly pessimistic. (Although I realize that it is no trivial task to generate good error messages, and typecheck efficiently.) /Lars L
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? George Beshers
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Thomas Hallgren
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Josef Sveningsson
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Carl R. Witty
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Carl R. Witty
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Andrew Moran
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Lars Lundgren
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Carl R. Witty
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Lennart Augustsson
- RE: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Nick Kallen
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Fergus Henderson
- RE: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Nick Kallen
- RE: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Nick Kallen
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell 2 -- Dependent types? Lennart Augustsson