> The question: is it reasonable to expect (,y) to be a right section of
> the (,) operator, or would this syntax break something (or perhaps lead
> to confusing error messages)?
It's very reasonable, nothing breaks, and it's quite useful.
I suggested it for Haskell (1.3, I think), but it was
rejected.
-- Lennart
- Sectioning tuples Keith Wansbrough
- Re: Sectioning tuples Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Sectioning tuples Keith Wansbrough
- Re: Sectioning tuples George Russell
