> My preference is still (B). (A) is not *very* bad, but should really > replicate (-7) "foo" be []? I could say: Sure, why not? replicate suffers from the same domain problem as take/drop. But instead I will point out that you don't need to define replicate via take, so, in principal, that behavior does not necessarily follow from how we define take/drop. Of course, you might end up forcing it if insist on some set of laws relating the two. --fac
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing ty... Craig Dickson
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos ... Fergus Henderson
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos in Haskel... Tom Pledger
- RE: drop & take [was: fixing typos in Haskel... Brian Boutel
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos in H... Fergus Henderson
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos in Haskel... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos in Haskel... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos in Haskel... Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos in H... Pablo E. Martinez Lopez
- Specialisation by constraint [was: drop &am... Tom Pledger
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos in H... Frank A. Christoph
- Re: drop & take [was: fixing typos in H... Jan Kort
- RE: drop & take [was: fixing typos in Haskel... Brian Boutel
- RE: drop & take [was: fixing typos in H... Frank A. Christoph
