| That wording is a little unclear, so I suggest clarifying
| it as follows:
|
| * The next operation allows one to extract a pseudo-random Int
| from the generator, returning a new generator as well.
| The integer returned may be positive or negative.
| Over a sufficiently large sequence of calls to next,
| the integers returned should be uniformly distributed
| over the whole range of Int (from minBound to maxBound,
| inclusive).
|
| If that clarification were made, there would be no need to
| introduce the `genRange' method that Simon P-J suggested.
Yes, that's a possible alternative. The current story says
"at least 30 bits"; you are suggesting [minBound..maxBound].
In effect, you would mandate that every generator must have
genRange g = (minBound,msxBound).
Seems like a reasonable alternative. Comments?
Simon
