I wrote recently on the need of prefix or suffix for `next',`split'
of Random.
Somebody corrected me, saying that Random.next
is, at least, possible.
It is all right. But I would like to add something.
If goodOp is an operation of *class* C, then C.goodOp
- when needed, - looks like a good disambiguation for goodOp
(is it of Haskell ?).
But if C is *module* in some program system, then C.goodOp
may be useful, but not so good as for the class case.
Because the developer often needs to rename the modules, to move
items between modules ...
But again, this hardly touches the module names, that are the part
of the Standard, like Random.
------------------
Sergey Mechveliani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
