Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk writes: > Thu, 16 Mar 2000 14:38:30 -0500, Chris Okasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze: > > > How are these two statements reconciled for recursive > > types such as > > > > newtype Foo = F Foo > > IMHO simply the only value of this type is bottom. [...] Hi. Shouldn't applying (\(F _) -> ()) differentiate between bottom and (F bottom)? Do the two statements reconcile trivially in this case, into "Foo has the same representation as Foo"? Regards, Tom
- newtypes Chris Okasaki
- Re: newtypes Neil Leslie
- The return of the Void [Was: newtypes] Patrik Jansson
- Re: The return of the Void [Was: newtyp... Fergus Henderson
- newtypes S.M.Kahrs
- Re: newtypes Sengan
- Re: newtypes Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: newtypes Tom Pledger
- Re: newtypes Fergus Henderson