On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 07:08:22PM -0700, Mike Jones wrote: > Is there a way to define (:=) to be (<-) in the context of a do? > The goal is to make the language look Pascal like for those who will use it. I'd say that goal is ill-concieved. If you are trying to help people learn functional programming, then this will only confuse them. <- in Haskell does not work the same as := in Pascal. It is not assignment in the Pascal sense, and it's no good to make people think that it is. Tim
- Changing <- to := Mike Jones
- RE: Changing <- to := Thimble Smith
- RE: Changing <- to := Mike Jones
- Re: Changing <- to := Julian Assange