Wed, 24 May 2000 01:24:57 -0700, Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze: > Performance will not be great. More like Hugs than GHC. Is this because of lack of optimization, or is it inherent in using Java bytecode? -- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/ \__/ GCS/M d- s+:-- a23 C+++$ UL++>++++$ P+++ L++>++++$ E- ^^ W++ N+++ o? K? w(---) O? M- V? PS-- PE++ Y? PGP+ t QRCZAK 5? X- R tv-- b+>++ DI D- G+ e>++++ h! r--%>++ y-
- Haskell -> Java bytecode? Johannes Waldmann
- Re: Haskell -> Java bytecode? George Russell
- RE: Haskell -> Java bytecode? Simon Peyton-Jones
- RE: Haskell -> Java bytecode? Kwanghoon Choi
- Re: Haskell -> Java bytecode? Jerzy Karczmarczuk
- Re: Haskell -> Java bytecode? Johannes Waldmann
- RE: Haskell -> Java bytecode? Erik Meijer
- RE: Haskell -> Java bytecode? Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: Haskell -> Java bytecode? johnsson
- RE: Haskell -> Java bytecode? Nigel Perry
- Re: Haskell -> Java bytecode? Thomas Hallgren
- RE: Haskell -> Java bytecode? Erik Meijer
- Re: Haskell -> Java bytecode? George Russell
- Re: Haskell -> Java bytecode? Artur Zawlocki
- Re: Haskell -> Java bytecode? Nigel Perry
- RE: Haskell -> Java bytecode? Ian Stark
- RE: Haskell -> Java bytecode? Erik Meijer