25 Jul 2000 08:56:09 GMT, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> Maybe conversion to and from nested pairs would do. But then changing
> the nature of tuples themselves would seem more appropriate. With
> GHC's -funbox-strict-fields it should be only an advantage.
Oops, -funbox-strict-fields does not work if the field type constructor
is a type variable. Hmm, obvious for generating a polymorphic code.
Nested pairs are significantly slower than tuples :-(
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/ GCS/M d- s+:-- a23 C+++$ UL++>++++$ P+++ L++>++++$ E-
^^ W++ N+++ o? K? w(---) O? M- V? PS-- PE++ Y? PGP+ t
QRCZAK 5? X- R tv-- b+>++ DI D- G+ e>++++ h! r--%>++ y-
