"Manuel M. T. Chakravarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A good analysis of were C# fits re Java and C++ is at > > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/08/09/1612254&mode=thread Wherein we read: > One new feature that I mentioned already was that of copy-by-value > objects. This seemingly small improvement is a potentially huge > performance saver! With C++, one is regularly tempted to describe the > simplest constructs as classes, and in so doing make it safer and > simpler to use them. For example, a phone directory program might > define a phone record as a class, and would maintain one PhoneRecord > object per actual record. In Java, each and every one of those objects > would be garbage collected! Now, is this really such a big problem? Is it a problem because of Java's mark-and-sweep, and if so, couldn't you apply a better GC? Isn't this just the old myth of GC being slow? -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Theodore Norvell
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Nigel Perry
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Claus Reinke
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Ketil Malde
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Florian Hars
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Keith Wansbrough
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Brent Fulgham
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Ketil Malde
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Doug Ransom
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Brent Fulgham
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Theodore Norvell
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Nigel Perry
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Benjamin Leon Russell