Fergus Henderson wrote: > > On 14-Aug-2000, Benjamin Leon Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ah, a testable hypothesis! If you are right, then you should be able to > > provide an example of a language that meets the requirements of writing > > both low-level kernel code and most user applications equally well for > > the bulk of the programmers working with the language! > > Well, how about Modula II and Ada? > Or maybe even better, Modula-3? Sietse Achterop
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Benjamin Leon Russell
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Sylvan Ravinet
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Sylvan Ravinet
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Tyson Dowd
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Benjamin Leon Russell
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Craig Dickson
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Fergus Henderson
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime S. Achterop IWI-120 3932
- RE: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Doug Ransom
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Adrian Hey
- Re: Haskell and the NGWS Runtime Erik Meijer
- Usability of M$ specs [was: Haskell and the ... Matthias Kilian