> > This is, needless to say, something of a matter of opinion and historical > interpretation. I wouldn't call LISP an FP language, though it is surely > ancestral to many FP languages, and many FP concepts have their basis in > LISP features. Could you explain why Lisp isn't a FP language? I think among others it is one. And the combination of features makes Lisp IMHO outstanding even nowadays. Regards Friedrich -- for e-mail reply remove all after .com
- The importance and relevance of FP Jacques Lemire
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Ketil Malde
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Craig Dickson
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Friedrich Dominicus
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Ketil Malde
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Manuel M. T. Chakravarty
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Julz
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Friedrich Dominicus
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Ketil Malde
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Friedrich Dominicus
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Benjamin Leon Russell
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Craig Dickson
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Benjamin Leon Russell
- Re: The importance and relevance of FP Ralf Muschall