I mumbled:
>
> This is not a legal type expression, since Tree is a
> type constructor, not a ground type, so you cannot apply it to the list
> constructor.
The other way round, of course: you cannot apply the list constructor to
it.
- Andreas
--
Andreas Rossberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:: be declarative. be functional. just be. ::
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
- class instance with nested types Matthias H�chsmann
- Re: class instance with nested types Lars Lundgren
- Re: class instance with nested types Matthias H�chsmann
- Re: class instance with nested types Andreas Rossberg
- Andreas Rossberg
