Julian Assange wrote (Dec 28, 2000):
> This is why all non S-exp like lanaguage are doomed to progressive
> syntactic cancer as the useful parts of operator name space and syntax
> space become progressively polluted and mutated by one fad after
> another.
Could you expand on this? I would think that all languages have identifies
that, through common usage become standardized, and that this meaning
becomes a de-facto part of the language. Do you feel that this has not
happened in Lisp/Scheme?
--PeterD
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
