Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote: | IMHO it looks nicer to have Byte in function names, so | there can be such type synonym too. Style Warning! Why do many people when designing libraries not make full use of the Haskell module system? Instead of writeByte readByte (or so), one could also say: Byte.write Byte.read So that the context (Byte.) can be left out when unambiguous, and one can just say: write read /Koen. -- Koen Claessen http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~koen phone:+46-31-772 5424 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------------------- Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
- Re: Binary files in Haskell Malcolm Wallace
- binary files in haskell Timmy Douglas
- Re: binary files in haskell Sven Panne
- Re: binary files in haskell John Meacham
- Re: binary files in haskell Sven Panne
- Re: binary files in haskell Timmy Douglas
- RE: binary files in haskell Simon Marlow
- Re: binary files in haskell Olaf Chitil
- Re: binary files in haskell Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: binary files in haskell Olaf Chitil
- Re: binary files in haskell Koen Claessen
- Re: binary files in haskell Johannes Waldmann
- Re: binary files in haskell Stefan Karrmann
- Re: binary files in haskell Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: binary files in haskell Koen Claessen
- Re: binary files in haskell Erik Meijer
- Re: binary files in haskell John Meacham
- Re: binary files in haskell Fergus Henderson