On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Christian Brolin wrote:
> What?? The compiler knows the full name of the module without the module
> clause.
It does not. File A/B/C/D.hs can be module A.B.C.D, or module B.C.D which
happened to be placed in a directory A, or C.D etc. It's ambiguous.
I'm not saying that I want to have to write full paths, but I see no other
choice.
> The dots was just my suggestion of a syntax for relative addresses.
> One dot: Relative to the parent of this module.
> Two dots: Relative to this module.
It's confusing. If at all, it should be the opposite, analogous
to . and .. directories. But it doesn't look clear either.
--
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
