(Apologies, I forgot to change the subject)
Laszlo Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * * * Ketil Malde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no difference. The 'pipe-syntax' (or pattern guards) gets
> desugared (by the pattern matching compiler) to case statements i.e.:
> runRandom = \ last max num.case (num > 1) of
> True -> runRandom (fst new) max (num-1)
> False -> snd new
But - the converse is not true, is it? I can write
... = case foo of
(Foo f) -> ...
(Bar b) -> ...
but I can't express that as a pattern-guarded expression, can I? My
impression here is that the PG syntax adds nothing, and is hardly any
more readable, and less intuitive for migrators from more traditional
language. Why is it there at all? Is there a (rough) guideline for
when to use one or the other?
> For a more detailed discussion see SPJ's book, Augustsson original
> paper, or M Pettersen't thesis (LNCS 1549).
Okay, I'll try to look them up.
-kzm
--
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
