Folks,
In the Haskell Report, Feliks points out:
| On pp. 5 and 120 the rule for "ANYseq" has a very strange
| structure: why the
| "{ANY}" at the beginning and end of the subtracted stuff? It
| seems it could
| be simplified, or at least explained.
I have no idea why it can't be just
ANYseq -> {ANY}_<opencomment | closecomment>
Can anyone see why this simpler form would not work?
I propose to adopt this simplification.
Simon
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
