Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:19:45 +0000, Malcolm Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> "with" is a perfectly valid Haskell function name, but Hugs may have
> stolen it for a language extension. Try giving Hugs the +98 option
> at startup, to ensure that all extensions are turned off. [Note to
> users of the implicit parameter extension: I believe in future the
> pseudo-keyword "with" will be removed and replaced by "let".]
I would like to replace "with" with "let" too. But SimonPJ said he
won't do it in ghc unless Hugs does it too, and Mark P Jones said
he won't do it in Hugs now (without deep reasons: no people/hours
to do that, and no plans to release next Hugs version this year).
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/
^^ SYGNATURA ZASTÊPCZA
QRCZAK
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
