On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 09:27:51AM +0200, John Hughes wrote: > One good reason for NOT giving inferrable type signatures is that > including them makes programs less modifiable: a small local change, such as > adding a parameter to a type, may force a large number of consequential > changes to type signatures. Absolutely -- suppose you add a `trace' somewhere in your program, which conjures up a Show constraint everywhere... -- Mieszko _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism C.Reinke
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Lennart Augustsson
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism Alastair Reid
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Launchbury
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Hughes
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- RE: Implict parameters and monomorphism Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Mieszko Lis
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism John Meacham
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Implict parameters and monomorphism Fergus Henderson