I'm trying to model probability and leave the representation of probability unspecified other than it must be class Real. But I'm having trouble with random numbers; how can I show that if a type has class Real, it also has class Random.Random? Is there a way to accomplish this goal other than by changing the library? Norman _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
- type classes and generality Norman Ramsey
- type classes and generality Tom Pledger
- Re: type classes and generality Fergus Henderson
- Re: type classes and generality Norman Ramsey
- Re: type classes and generality Fergus Henderson
- Re: type classes and generality Alexander V. Voinov
- Re: type classes and generality Fergus Henderson
- Re: type classes and generality Lennart Augustsson
- Re: type classes and generality Alexander V. Voinov
- Re: type classes and generality Lennart Augustsson