| 3. A precedence table says that case (rightwards) has higher
| precedence than operators and right associativity. If it's
| meaningful to talk about precedence of such syntactic
| constructs as case at all, it should probably be told to have
| a lower precedence, so "case x+1 of ..." is valid as "case
| (x+1) of ...". At least I don't see a difference between
| "case" (rightwards) and "if" (rightwards). I'm not sure if it
| makes sense to explain parsing of "case" in terms of precedence.
I can't make head or tail of what Table 1 (Section 3, beginning) is
trying to say. It claims to be an "aid to understanding the grammar",
but it seems downright confusing to me.
Proposal: remove Table 1 and its associated paragraph.
Does anyone like it?
Simon
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
