On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 04:00:39PM +0100, Arthur Baars wrote:
> In the context-free grammar proposed by Ross Paterson
> the following line:
>   expix -> expi+1B [qop(n,i) expi+1x]
> 
> should be replaced by
>   expix -> [expi+1B qop(n,i)] expi+1x

Yes.  (In fact that's what I had in the revised hssource grammar,
but I mistranscribed it.)
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell

Reply via email to