Looking at the online GHC Users Guide, this flag is documented in
4.19.14. Individual optimisations
This has a link to Section 4.11.2, but -fall-strict isn't described in
that section. Presumably its only been half removed (added) from the
documentation.
k
Simon Marlow writes:
> > On 10 Mar 2002, Jyrinx wrote:
> >
>
> > Never fear,
> > -fall-strict is here!
>
> I had no idea this flag still worked. As I recall, it was an experiment
> that turned out to be a bad idea - you're probably just better off using
> seq.
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
>
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
