Max Kirillov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 03:05:34PM +1100, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty wrote: > > Again, XEmacs with the above mentioned Haskell mode can do > > it. Just execute the function `htmlize-buffer' on a buffer > > containing the Haskell source. As an example for the > > generated output, have a look at > > > > http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~chak/haskell/gtk/BoolEd.html > > > > The detailed choice of colours is, of course, adjustable. > > At least on a Unix machine, I am quite sure you can use > > XEmacs also in batch mode to generate the HTML (eg, as part > > of a Makefile), but I haven't actually used it that way yet. > > 1. Why CSS?
CSS is fine, ... > Why did I need to enable Java in my Netscape to > see the colours? Man, it's just to _indent_ and _paint_! it is Netscape which is rotten ;-) There is no reason in a Web browser to have to activate extra languages to implement CSS...except bad software design. I'd suggest to get a proper browser like Mozilla http://mozilla.org/ or Galeon http://galeon.sourceforge.net/ (I particularly like the latter.) (Switching on JavaScript is sufficient, btw.) > 2. When I hear "translate to HTML" I imagine that underlined > words which can be clicked to see, say, definition of > function. Sadly, most htmlizers are focused on highlighting > rather than navigation. The good news is that could be > simply cured with postprocessing of the resulting html file > using tags file. There are several tags generators for > haskell, both for vim and emacs (ghc distribution contains 2 > of them). So the problem can be "reduced to the already > seen". It depends what you want. A tool which cross-references variable occurences, I would call a cross reference tool rather than an HTML pretty-printer. Cheers, Manuel _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
