Hi, > You don't have to define cpsfold explicitly recursively since it can be > expressed in terms of foldr:
Is this generally considered good design? That is, is it generally preferred to express functions in a nonrecursive style if that can be done using standard library functions like foldr and map and filter, etc? Okay, obviousloy everything *can* be done in that manner, so I guess my question is why should we write something using foldr when, imo, the explicitely recursive version is easier to parse (as a human). - Hal _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
