A number of people have discussed the use of implicit parameters to mimic global variables in Haskell. I am wondering if any have done the same for a first-class module system such as that proposed by Shields and Jones. It seems to make a tremendous amount of sense to do it that way:
1. semi-constant values: Things that are calculated or input at the beginning of the program could be handled by Main.main, which would pass the results to the Second module, whose main function it could then call. This seems much more natural than the implicit parameter approach for this purpose. 2. others: whenever a group of functions are likely to share a particular argument, they can be grouped in a module for greater convenience. For example, a library of mathematical functions that should all share a certain precision indicator could be grouped in a module: the user of the module could instantiate it once with the right precision and then use all the functions at that precision. David Feuer (please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
