At 2002-05-10 10:38, C.Reinke wrote: >existing split, this ought to be split off the haskell list (i.e., >everyone subscribed to haskell would initially be subscribed to >haskell and to haskell-announce). > >Opinions? Suggestions?
I suggest that all posts to haskell-announce are copied to haskell. Perhaps even the haskell list should itself be subscribed to haskell-announce. And of course then initially no-one should be subscribed to haskell-announce. Furthermore haskell-announce should be moderated, so all posts to it are screened before distribution. This seems to be the standard way of doing things for announce/discussion list pairs. This way people only need to be subscribed to one of them, and there's no chance of missing announcements just because you're only subscribed to one list. -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
