Robert Ennals <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I personally much prefer the syntax currently used in Haskell, which is also > essentially what is used in most other recent languages, including Java, C++, > and (god help me) Perl. > > In the example given, I could write: > > "I have " ++ action ++ " " ++ number ++ " " ++ whatas > where > action = "trained" > number = show 1 > whatas = "Jedi"
This is all fine and dandy, but how would you translate this to 42 different languages your customers want supported, with different word order and all that? -- anatoli t. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
