On 2002-05-14T12:32:30-0400, Jan-Willem Maessen wrote: > And I'd really much rather we cleaned up the semantics of > seq---or better yet, fixed the problems with lazy evaluation which > make seq necessary in the first place.
A general question: What is seq useful for, other than efficiency? -- Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig QUIET! Do you smell something?
msg10886/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
