Jon Fairbairn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why "-f" anyway? It took me ages to work out what > "-fallow-overlapping-instances" meant -- I wondered how > "fallow" could apply to overlapping instances.
I suppose it's a GCCism, where options starting with -f specifiy *f*lags. (Which doesn't seem to apply to GHC, unless there's a -fno-allow... (of -fdont-allow...?)) -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell