On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:16:16 -0800 (PST) Hal Daume III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can't have "invisible functions". The only thing that should be done is to invent a special name for the juxtaposition operator (or just to use $), and to let (->) become an instance of the "Function" class. I'd also like this, because it would enable stuff like associative maps used as functions. Vincenzo -- First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. [Gandhi] _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
