sorry for the double post yesterday, thomas had some sort of a problem sending mail to the list, so i sent the message instead, but i guess eventually both messages ended up being posted.
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
So I am happy to adopt your interpretation, but I'd like to clarify the wording.
Here's an alternative sentence:
The form "module M" names the set of all entities that are in
scope with both an unqualified name 'e' and a qualified name
'M.e'.
Would that be better? Can you suggest anything else?
i think this formulation is better. bye iavor
-- ================================================== | Iavor S. Diatchki, Ph.D. student | | Department of Computer Science and Engineering | | School of OGI at OHSU | | http://www.cse.ogi.edu/~diatchki | ================================================== _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
