> Question 1: Is there an easier, more elegant way to write this code? For the most part, no.
> Question 2: Is there a way to express the following relationship? > I want to have a set of symbols with ordering and another set that is > part of that ordering but with a different parent. For exammple, > > data Player = Detective | Fugitive deriving (Enum) > data Detective = Red | Green | Blue deriving (Enum) > data Fugitive = MrX deriving (Enum) How about something like: > data Player = Detective Detective | Fugitive Fugitive deriving (Enum) > data Detective = Red | Green | Blue deriving (Enum) > data Fugitive = MrX deriving (Enum) (I'm not sure if the deriving Enum on Player will be exactly what you want -- I think so though. I don't derive this class very often.) Then you can test detectiveness by: > isDetective (Detective _) = True > isDetective _ = False HTH - Hal _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
