John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > "should always have" is unfortunately ambiguous: does it mean "you should > ensure that...", or "we believe that..., but we're not completely sure". I > suggest changing the last phrase to > > ...; to avoid this, the programmer should ensure that the result of > unsafePerformIO has a monomorphic type.
Done. Thanks, Manuel _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
