Evening, Ralf. Ralf Laemmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 20:27 24/7/2003 wrote:
RL> a) Add a class constraint for Show to the Term class. RL> (Would that work? It's a bit invasive anyway.) Yes, that a bit invasive to say at least. With equal "ease" I can hack DrIFT to produce instances of Show the way I want them. RL> b) Alternatively, imoort TermRep and use explode and then show on RL> TermRep. (This show maybe does not look so nice, RL> but this should be good enough for debugging.) I dont quite follow you here. If I (show . explode) the topmost Term, I got just the name of the type of that term. If I try to build a traversal which "explode"-s everything on the way, I got the same error as before (which is expected, I believe). RL> c) Be more specific about what terms to print, RL> say have type-specific cases for types of terms of interest. (This RL> would be reasonable if you only care about a few types, RL> or there are even just a few types anyway.) Thing is that there is a lot of types and I'd like to print all of them. -- Dmitry Astapov //ADEpt GPG KeyID/fprint: F5D7639D/CA36 E6C4 815D 434D 0498 2B08 7867 4860 F5D7 639D _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
