On Tuesday, 2003-08-19, 13:18, Simon Marlow wrote: > [...] > Yes, I agree that one shouldn't rely on the "no duplication of work" > property. However, folloing this argument we arrive at the conclusion that > hGetContents is an invalid use of unsafePerformIO. (which is something I've > been saying for a while now :-).
Can't hGetContents be implemented without unsafePerformIO but with unsafeInterleaveIO? Wouldn't this be valid? Am I'm missing something here? > Cheers, > Simon Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
