On Tuesday 09 September 2003 13:52, Johannes Waldmann wrote: > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Adrian Hey wrote: > > I rarely use named fields in my Haskell progs with Haskell as it is ... > > but you sure agree records are useful for collecting heterogenous data?
Yes, I would agree that even the current situation is sometimes better than having a large number of unnamed fields (as a huge-tuple say). But for the average product type or constructor (2..3 fields), it just isn't worth the aggrovation IMO. Regards -- Adrian Hey _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
