On Wednesday 10 September 2003 07:22 am, Hal Daume III wrote: > I agree with Malcolm, with the possible addition of: > > keep -fglasgow-exts as it is (or, even, perhaps continue making it the > "add all extensions keyword). also have -fffi, -farrows, -fth, etc. > but also have, -fnoth and -fnoffi. that way, if a lot of us have code > that uses all the extensions other than TH and have lots of code that > looks like (foo$bar), we can just to -fglasgow-exts -fnoth. > > seems to be a win-win.
I agree; I want a catch-all flag, but I also want to flexibility to be able to pick and choose. Both -f<feature> and -fno<feature> is the way to go IMHO. A -- Andy Moran Ph. (503) 626 6616, x113 Galois Connections Inc. Fax. (503) 350 0833 12725 SW Millikan Way, Suite #290 http://www.galois.com Beaverton, OR 97005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
